Showing posts with label pollution solutions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label pollution solutions. Show all posts

Friday, January 20, 2017

Scary truth about America's diet (food waste & unhealthy food consumption)

According to Ecowatch:"90 percent of the foods humans eat come from just 30 plants. Out of tens of thousands of plants we could eat, mankind chooses to consume only about 30 of them. It’s crazy to contemplate how limited our diets are compared to all of the different foods we could be eating".
A diet of 30 plants that humans consume is less worrisome that Michael Pollan's argument.
As mentioned in my post on re-wilding yourself with wild edibles, Michael Pollan has much to discuss on this subject. Pollan in In Defense of Food, says that the majority of American's calories come from 4 foods: wheat, sugar, soy, and corn. However he also mentions that another big portion of the calories come from dairy and meat products as you can see in the pie chart below from Food is Medicine.

US Food ConsumptionMany health gurus tell you to eat simple, and this makes intuitively like eating an apple. I consider my diet simple as far as eating a large variety of fruits, vegetables, greens, grains, beans, nuts, seeds, but this means that I'm get a variety of vitamins and minerals. The kind of simplification in the typical American's diet is excluding these health foods for diet that is simplified to a handful of the same ingredients for every meal with a different arrangement of those ingredients.



Let me be clear: I do not fault an individual for the availability and price of unhealthy processed foods. Actually, there is much to say about the way food is distributed such as grocery gaps where urban and rural areas have to travel up to 20-50 miles to get a grocery store. Considering this, there are family dollar stores, gas stations, and liquor stores in close proximity to the poor urban and rural regions of this country. I can protest all day to avoid putting your dollar in these big corporations that are making you and your family unhealthy. And let me also be clear: just because your skinny, doesn't mean your healthy; and just because you're fat, doesn't mean your unhealthy.
In considering all of this, who do we look to that created this unhealthy industry? Do the CEOs and head management eat the crap that they sell in stores? Does Doritoes eat Doritoes? Do these people that run the corporations let their children sit in front of the TV and watch the food ads they put on TV to brainwash children?
It's similar, but not quite the same way cigarettes are sold. There is a warning label on cigarettes, but the only labels on packaged foods are those that are deceiving you into thinking it's a health food. Healthy food is a whole food like fresh fruits and vegetables.

The limited ingredients in a diet is just the least of our worries, because a much more pressing issue is that 40% of U.S. food is wasted, equating to $165 billion a year in waste according to CNN. This means that there IS enough food to feed the world, and the problem isn't an expanding population where the globe cannot produce enough food for everyone. This is another problem with corporations: they're producing too much food, and distributing too much food in the most consumer-heavy regions. Of course packaged food has a "long shelf life", which basically mean there isn't any nutrition left. So, let's consider what food is wasted the most. I worry, though, that when people do attempt to eat fruits and vegetables, this food typically goes to waste. 
 As mentioned, packaged food that can be preserved with a longer shelf life than fresh, raw fruits and vegetables, is a mixture of those same ingredients of meat, dairy, wheat, corn, soy, and sugar. Because these foods are highly processed, thus their raw, fresh form loses the nutrients and minerals that once was there before the processing. The solution to unhealthy food consumption and food waste isn't to grow more, sell more, or donate more. The solution lies within the power structure. This may sound like a radical idea, but by giving people and families their own land to grow their own food will be part of the solution.
This further angers me because there is the safety of pesticides and GMO foods argument that we need these technological innovations to ensure we have enough food and no money is wasted--well, isn't that a laugh when we consider that people deliberately are wasting food, and corporations continue to over produce and over sell foods. Not only is food wasted and chemicals used becomes unnecessary, but fuel and transportation become wasted. And lets get real about the land we use for what: where we have hundreds of acres of wheat, corn, and soy being grown exclusively for the fattening of cows, chickens, pigs, and animals to get fat on their unnatural diet in order for humans to consume them.

Of course there are many solutions, but we cannot keep making the same mistake of selling and growing more, because the problem is where the food is getting distributed, as mentioned by National Geographic: "the richer the nation, the higher its per capita rate of waste." National Geographic also states that: "To compound the environmental insult, food buried in the airless confines of dumps generates methane, a greenhouse gas far more potent than carbon dioxide. If global food waste were a country, it would be the third largest generator of greenhouse gases in the world behind China and the United States."
 Restaurant buffets are notorious for food waste. In fact the other day as I watched my mother and sister eat at a Chinese restaurant, we examined a family that continued to get food from the buffet that they ended up leaving there to be thrown away. My mother, sister, and I were furious at this, to the point we wanted to take the food (because we watched, and the food wasn't touched). 

Additionally, we have to refuse a global food corporation like McDonalds taking over America,  India, Asia, and Africa. We got to refine the food market, but the food shall not be refined! 
The solution is not necessarily individuals taking their business elsewhere, it is a matter of a culture shift and changing our perspective about the kinds of food we want to sustain the planet that works with this planet.

Sunday, January 8, 2017

How many people lack access to clean drinking water?

After Flint changed its water source to the Flint River, its drinking water had a water crisis from lead contamination. So, let's not forget that this is a political power issue where those in power were not concerned about the people. Of course this power has to do with "saving" money by switching water sources while also failing to change the pipes in that water source. Thus, between 6,000 to 12,000 children have been exposed to drinking water with high levels of lead, experiencing a range of serious health problems.
With the ongoing crisis in Flint, Michigan, we must ask ourselves: how many people lack access to clean drinking water?
Because some of us who live in a comfortable home with running water, sometimes we forget that many in the rest of the world does not have the same luxury. According to the WHO based on 2015 findings, 2.6 billion people lack even a simple ‘improved’ latrine and 1.1 billion people has no access to any type of improved drinking source of water. In 2010, that number was 783 million people who did not have access to clean drinking water (37% of those people live in Sub-Saharan Africa). At the time 1 in 9 people world wide did not have access to safe and clean drinking water in 2010.

As a direct consequence, in developing countries, as much as 80% of illnesses are linked to poor water and sanitation conditions according to the United Nations--For example, 1.6 million people die every year from diarrhoeal diseases (including cholera). Of those 1.6 million, 90% of these are children under 5, mostly in developing countries.  Other diseases attributable to lack of access to safe drinking water include,  schistosomiasis, trachoma, and intestinal helminths (ascariasis, trichuriasis and hookworm infection). This is why half of the world's hospital beds are filled with people suffering from a water-related disease!
Sadly, over half of the developing world's primary schools don't have access to water and sanitation facilities; and without toilets, girls often drop out at puberty. Thus, when water sanitation interventions are put in place, there will be a reduce in girls dropping out of school, there will be less disease and deaths.

Inventor of the Segway and iBot mobility system, Dean Kamen, created a water purification system called the Slingshot several years ago, to place in developing countries that lack access to clean drinking water. The system is powered by a Stirling engine running on a combustible fuel source. Proposed, the Slingshot is claimed to be able to produce drinking water from almost any source by means of vapor compression distillation, requires no filters, and can operate using cow dung as fuel.
Other characteristics of the machine include:



  • five years of operation without overhaul or maintenance
  • use less than a kilowatt of power (lower than the power consumption of a hair dryer)
  • generate 1000 liters of pure water/day, enough for 100 people for hygiene and cooking
  • meets the U.S. pharmacopoeic standard for water for injections
  • requires no pre-treatment, pipelines, engineers, consumables (osmosis membranes, charcoal, etc.), or installation permits


  • Another water purification system, the Lifestraw, is a plastic tube that draws water up through the straw-- first passing through hollow fibers that filter water particles down. It filters a maximum of 1000 litres of water, enough for one person for one year. It removes almost all of waterborne bacteria and parasites. In addition to the classic LifeStraw, the manufacturer also produces other styles on the LifeStraw product: the LifeStraw Family, a larger unit designed for family use (Lifestraw wiki.) I have reviewed the Lifestraw, which you can watch in the video here: Lifestraw review
    It is also inexpensive. I'm not sure of the distribution of these products. I am aware that they are donated and also given in natural disasters around the world.
    But, this invention is more of a survival and wilderness tool. I am more interested in the water purification systems that are built within the home. Notice in the picture below a cistern which collects rainwater which is connected to a filter for drinkable water and in sinks. The gray water tank flushes waste water which gets distributed to plants non edible plants without a filter, and to the edible plants which will require a peat filter. This intricate system provides you the convenience and luxury of indoor plumbing and running water, while reducing water consumption.

    pinterest.com
    Once again, water is a political issue because it affects people personally those who do and do not have access to clean drinking water. Water should be a right, not a privilege. The Flint water crisis may be summed up to environmental racism because historically brown and black folks across the world have experienced this, but of course it is much more complex of an issue. So, let's make 2017 THE year that we ALL have access to clean, free, readily-available drinking water for ALL people.